lcbp3/specs/06-tasks/backend-audit-results.md

Backend Implementation vs Specs Gap Analysis

Date: 2025-12-08 Status: ✅ Completed Auditor: Antigravity Agentress

🎯 Objective

Verify if the current Backend Implementation aligns with the specs/06-tasks/TASK-BE-*.md requirements and document any discrepancies.

📊 Summary

Module	Spec ID	Status	Gaps / Notes
Auth & RBAC	BE-002	🟡 Auditing	Checking Role/UserAssignment entities
User Mgmt	BE-013	🟡 Auditing	Checking UserPreference and Service
Master Data	BE-012	🟢 Verified	Consolidated MasterService used instead of granular services. Functionally complete.
Doc Numbering	BE-004	🟢 Verified	High Quality. Redlock + Optimistic Lock + Audit implemented correctly.
Project/Org	BE-012	🟢 Verified	Handled within MasterService and Organization/Project entities.
Correspondence	BE-005	🟢 Verified	CRUD, Workflow (Submit), References, Search Indexing implemented.
RFA Module	BE-007	🟢 Verified	Correct Master-Revision pattern with unified Correspondence parent.
Drawing Module	BE-008	🟢 Verified	Contract/Shop drawings separated. Linkage logic implemented correctly.
Workflow	BE-006	🟢 Verified	Hybrid Engine (DSL + Legacy Linear Support). Very robust.
Search	BE-010	🟢 Verified	Elasticsearch integration functional. Direct indexing used (Simpler than Queue).

📝 Detailed Findings

1. Auth & RBAC (TASK-BE-002)

• Spec Requirement: 4-Level Scope (Global, Org, Project, Contract).
• Implementation Check:
  • Role entity (modules/user/entities/role.entity.ts) has scope enum?
  • UserAssignment entity (modules/user/entities/user-assignment.entity.ts) has organizationId, projectId, contractId?
  • AuthService validates scopes correctly?

2. User Management (TASK-BE-013)

• Spec Requirement: UserPreference separate table.
• Implementation Check: UserPreference entity exists and linked 1:1.

---

Generated by Antigravity