np-dms/lcbp3
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
2c24991f884d903cc2e987f8d4195a938f05794d
lcbp3/specs/003-unified-workflow-engine/checklists/requirements.md
T
admin 2c24991f88
CI / CD Pipeline / build (push) Failing after 6m6s
Details
CI / CD Pipeline / deploy (push) Has been skipped
Details
690503:0135 Update workflow #01
2026-05-03 01:36:37 +07:00

2.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Unified Workflow Engine — Production Hardening & Integrated Context

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-05-02 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • [~] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — Note: Technology-specific terms (Redis, BullMQ, ClamAV, JSON Logic) are present in FRs as ADR-mandated architectural constraints (ADR-001/ADR-008/ADR-016), not spec-level implementation choices. Consistent with existing 001-transmittals-circulation/spec.md pattern.
  • Focused on user value and business needs
  • [~] Written for non-technical stakeholders — Note: Platform/infrastructure feature; technical Functional Requirements (FR-001 to FR-021) intentionally use ADR terminology. User Stories (P1-P3) and Success Criteria are non-technical.
  • All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • Success criteria are measurable
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • Edge cases are identified
  • Scope is clearly bounded
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • User scenarios cover primary flows
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Spec derived from ADR-001 (Unified Workflow Engine v1.1 — 2026-05-02 production hardening) and ADR-021 (Integrated Workflow Context & Step-specific Attachments)
  • Clarification session 2026-05-02 (5/5 questions resolved):
    • Q1: DSL require.role → CASL ability check (FR-002a)
    • Q2: Observability = structured log + metrics (FR-022, FR-023, SC-009)
    • Q3: File rollback on DB failure = move back to temp, 24h TTL (FR-019)
    • Q4: Admin UI for DSL authoring is IN scope (FR-024, FR-025)
    • Q5: All 4 modules (RFA/Transmittal/Circulation/Correspondence) need banner gap-filling (FR-011, Assumptions updated)
  • ADR-001 clarifications fully captured in FR-001 through FR-010 and SC-001 through SC-005
  • ADR-021 requirements (REQ-01 to REQ-06) fully captured in FR-011 through FR-025 and SC-006 through SC-009
  • Visual workflow builder (drag-and-drop DSL editor) is explicitly out of scope (Phase 2)
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink