np-dms/lcbp3
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
a80ebef28508055b35425217e68b635c67a9622d
lcbp3/specs/100-Infrastructures/141-server-consolidation/checklists/requirements.md
T
admin a80ebef285
CI / CD Pipeline / build (push) Successful in 7m37s
Details
CI / CD Pipeline / deploy (push) Failing after 20m15s
Details
refactor(ai): OCR sidecar canonical naming cleanup — typhoon→np-dms, remove hardcoded keys, asyncio.to_thread, ADR-040/041
2026-06-20 16:37:04 +07:00

2.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

Specification Quality Checklist: Single-Host Server Consolidation

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-20 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — spec focuses on operational outcomes
  • Focused on user value and business needs — admin/ops workflows clearly defined
  • Written for non-technical stakeholders — user stories describe journeys, not code
  • All mandatory sections completed — User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria all filled

Requirement Completeness

  • No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain — all requirements have clear definitions
  • Requirements are testable and unambiguous — each FR has measurable acceptance criteria
  • Success criteria are measurable — SC-001 through SC-010 have specific metrics
  • Success criteria are technology-agnostic — focus on outcomes (parity, latency, uptime) not tools
  • All acceptance scenarios are defined — 5 user stories with Given/When/Then scenarios
  • Edge cases are identified — 7 edge cases covering GPU OOM, RAM, CIFS, SPOF, network, migration failures
  • Scope is clearly bounded — includes provisioning, migration, cutover, security, decommission
  • Dependencies and assumptions identified — 7 assumptions documented

Feature Readiness

  • All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria — FR-001 through FR-015 mapped to user stories
  • User scenarios cover primary flows — P1 (provision) → P2 (migrate) → P3 (cutover) → P4 (security) → P5 (decommission)
  • Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria — 10 measurable outcomes
  • No implementation details leak into specification — Docker/tech names are inherent to infra spec but kept at architecture level

Notes

  • This is an infrastructure specification based on ADR-041; some technical terms (Docker, CIFS, VRAM) are inherent to the domain
  • ADR-040 (OCR Sidecar Refactor) is a hard dependency for FR-008 (remove X-API-Key) and FR-009 (GPU VRAM management)
  • Spec is ready for /speckit-clarify or /speckit-plan
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink