# Specification Quality Checklist: Dynamic Prompt Management for OCR Extraction

**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-05-25
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)

## Content Quality

- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed

## Requirement Completeness

- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded (prompt_type = 'ocr_extraction' only)
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified

## Feature Readiness

- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows (manage versions, sandbox test, runtime resolution)
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification

## Notes

- Spec is derived from ADR-029 grilling session (2026-05-25) — high confidence, minimal ambiguity
- `field_schema` column: assumed system-managed metadata (not user-editable) in v1 — documented in Assumptions
- Timeout fix scope (sandbox only) documented in Assumptions to prevent scope creep
- Seed data requirement (FR-011) explicitly stated to prevent deploy-time failure