406 lines
		
	
	
		
			20 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			JavaScript
		
	
	
		
			Executable File
		
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			406 lines
		
	
	
		
			20 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			JavaScript
		
	
	
		
			Executable File
		
	
	
	
	
"use strict";
 | 
						|
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", {
 | 
						|
    value: true
 | 
						|
});
 | 
						|
Object.defineProperty(exports, "cookies", {
 | 
						|
    enumerable: true,
 | 
						|
    get: function() {
 | 
						|
        return cookies;
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
});
 | 
						|
const _requestcookies = require("../web/spec-extension/adapters/request-cookies");
 | 
						|
const _cookies = require("../web/spec-extension/cookies");
 | 
						|
const _workasyncstorageexternal = require("../app-render/work-async-storage.external");
 | 
						|
const _workunitasyncstorageexternal = require("../app-render/work-unit-async-storage.external");
 | 
						|
const _dynamicrendering = require("../app-render/dynamic-rendering");
 | 
						|
const _staticgenerationbailout = require("../../client/components/static-generation-bailout");
 | 
						|
const _dynamicrenderingutils = require("../dynamic-rendering-utils");
 | 
						|
const _creatededupedbycallsiteservererrorlogger = require("../create-deduped-by-callsite-server-error-logger");
 | 
						|
const _utils = require("./utils");
 | 
						|
const _invarianterror = require("../../shared/lib/invariant-error");
 | 
						|
const _reflect = require("../web/spec-extension/adapters/reflect");
 | 
						|
function cookies() {
 | 
						|
    const callingExpression = 'cookies';
 | 
						|
    const workStore = _workasyncstorageexternal.workAsyncStorage.getStore();
 | 
						|
    const workUnitStore = _workunitasyncstorageexternal.workUnitAsyncStorage.getStore();
 | 
						|
    if (workStore) {
 | 
						|
        if (workUnitStore && workUnitStore.phase === 'after' && !(0, _utils.isRequestAPICallableInsideAfter)()) {
 | 
						|
            throw Object.defineProperty(new Error(// TODO(after): clarify that this only applies to pages?
 | 
						|
            `Route ${workStore.route} used "cookies" inside "after(...)". This is not supported. If you need this data inside an "after" callback, use "cookies" outside of the callback. See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/canary/app/api-reference/functions/after`), "__NEXT_ERROR_CODE", {
 | 
						|
                value: "E88",
 | 
						|
                enumerable: false,
 | 
						|
                configurable: true
 | 
						|
            });
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
        if (workStore.forceStatic) {
 | 
						|
            // When using forceStatic we override all other logic and always just return an empty
 | 
						|
            // cookies object without tracking
 | 
						|
            const underlyingCookies = createEmptyCookies();
 | 
						|
            return makeUntrackedExoticCookies(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
        if (workStore.dynamicShouldError) {
 | 
						|
            throw Object.defineProperty(new _staticgenerationbailout.StaticGenBailoutError(`Route ${workStore.route} with \`dynamic = "error"\` couldn't be rendered statically because it used \`cookies\`. See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/building-your-application/rendering/static-and-dynamic#dynamic-rendering`), "__NEXT_ERROR_CODE", {
 | 
						|
                value: "E549",
 | 
						|
                enumerable: false,
 | 
						|
                configurable: true
 | 
						|
            });
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
        if (workUnitStore) {
 | 
						|
            switch(workUnitStore.type){
 | 
						|
                case 'cache':
 | 
						|
                    const error = Object.defineProperty(new Error(`Route ${workStore.route} used "cookies" inside "use cache". Accessing Dynamic data sources inside a cache scope is not supported. If you need this data inside a cached function use "cookies" outside of the cached function and pass the required dynamic data in as an argument. See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/next-request-in-use-cache`), "__NEXT_ERROR_CODE", {
 | 
						|
                        value: "E398",
 | 
						|
                        enumerable: false,
 | 
						|
                        configurable: true
 | 
						|
                    });
 | 
						|
                    Error.captureStackTrace(error, cookies);
 | 
						|
                    workStore.invalidDynamicUsageError ??= error;
 | 
						|
                    throw error;
 | 
						|
                case 'unstable-cache':
 | 
						|
                    throw Object.defineProperty(new Error(`Route ${workStore.route} used "cookies" inside a function cached with "unstable_cache(...)". Accessing Dynamic data sources inside a cache scope is not supported. If you need this data inside a cached function use "cookies" outside of the cached function and pass the required dynamic data in as an argument. See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/functions/unstable_cache`), "__NEXT_ERROR_CODE", {
 | 
						|
                        value: "E157",
 | 
						|
                        enumerable: false,
 | 
						|
                        configurable: true
 | 
						|
                    });
 | 
						|
                case 'prerender':
 | 
						|
                    return makeHangingCookies(workStore, workUnitStore);
 | 
						|
                case 'prerender-client':
 | 
						|
                    const exportName = '`cookies`';
 | 
						|
                    throw Object.defineProperty(new _invarianterror.InvariantError(`${exportName} must not be used within a client component. Next.js should be preventing ${exportName} from being included in client components statically, but did not in this case.`), "__NEXT_ERROR_CODE", {
 | 
						|
                        value: "E693",
 | 
						|
                        enumerable: false,
 | 
						|
                        configurable: true
 | 
						|
                    });
 | 
						|
                case 'prerender-ppr':
 | 
						|
                    // We need track dynamic access here eagerly to keep continuity with
 | 
						|
                    // how cookies has worked in PPR without cacheComponents.
 | 
						|
                    return (0, _dynamicrendering.postponeWithTracking)(workStore.route, callingExpression, workUnitStore.dynamicTracking);
 | 
						|
                case 'prerender-legacy':
 | 
						|
                    // We track dynamic access here so we don't need to wrap the cookies
 | 
						|
                    // in individual property access tracking.
 | 
						|
                    return (0, _dynamicrendering.throwToInterruptStaticGeneration)(callingExpression, workStore, workUnitStore);
 | 
						|
                case 'prerender-runtime':
 | 
						|
                    return (0, _dynamicrendering.delayUntilRuntimeStage)(workUnitStore, makeUntrackedCookies(workUnitStore.cookies));
 | 
						|
                case 'private-cache':
 | 
						|
                    if (process.env.__NEXT_CACHE_COMPONENTS) {
 | 
						|
                        return makeUntrackedCookies(workUnitStore.cookies);
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
                    return makeUntrackedExoticCookies(workUnitStore.cookies);
 | 
						|
                case 'request':
 | 
						|
                    (0, _dynamicrendering.trackDynamicDataInDynamicRender)(workUnitStore);
 | 
						|
                    let underlyingCookies;
 | 
						|
                    if ((0, _requestcookies.areCookiesMutableInCurrentPhase)(workUnitStore)) {
 | 
						|
                        // We can't conditionally return different types here based on the context.
 | 
						|
                        // To avoid confusion, we always return the readonly type here.
 | 
						|
                        underlyingCookies = workUnitStore.userspaceMutableCookies;
 | 
						|
                    } else {
 | 
						|
                        underlyingCookies = workUnitStore.cookies;
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
                    if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development') {
 | 
						|
                        // Semantically we only need the dev tracking when running in `next dev`
 | 
						|
                        // but since you would never use next dev with production NODE_ENV we use this
 | 
						|
                        // as a proxy so we can statically exclude this code from production builds.
 | 
						|
                        if (process.env.__NEXT_CACHE_COMPONENTS) {
 | 
						|
                            return makeUntrackedCookiesWithDevWarnings(underlyingCookies, workStore == null ? void 0 : workStore.route);
 | 
						|
                        }
 | 
						|
                        return makeUntrackedExoticCookiesWithDevWarnings(underlyingCookies, workStore == null ? void 0 : workStore.route);
 | 
						|
                    } else {
 | 
						|
                        if (process.env.__NEXT_CACHE_COMPONENTS) {
 | 
						|
                            return makeUntrackedCookies(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
                        }
 | 
						|
                        return makeUntrackedExoticCookies(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
                default:
 | 
						|
                    workUnitStore;
 | 
						|
            }
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    // If we end up here, there was no work store or work unit store present.
 | 
						|
    (0, _workunitasyncstorageexternal.throwForMissingRequestStore)(callingExpression);
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function createEmptyCookies() {
 | 
						|
    return _requestcookies.RequestCookiesAdapter.seal(new _cookies.RequestCookies(new Headers({})));
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
const CachedCookies = new WeakMap();
 | 
						|
function makeHangingCookies(workStore, prerenderStore) {
 | 
						|
    const cachedPromise = CachedCookies.get(prerenderStore);
 | 
						|
    if (cachedPromise) {
 | 
						|
        return cachedPromise;
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    const promise = (0, _dynamicrenderingutils.makeHangingPromise)(prerenderStore.renderSignal, workStore.route, '`cookies()`');
 | 
						|
    CachedCookies.set(prerenderStore, promise);
 | 
						|
    return promise;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function makeUntrackedCookies(underlyingCookies) {
 | 
						|
    const cachedCookies = CachedCookies.get(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    if (cachedCookies) {
 | 
						|
        return cachedCookies;
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    const promise = Promise.resolve(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    CachedCookies.set(underlyingCookies, promise);
 | 
						|
    return promise;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function makeUntrackedExoticCookies(underlyingCookies) {
 | 
						|
    const cachedCookies = CachedCookies.get(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    if (cachedCookies) {
 | 
						|
        return cachedCookies;
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    const promise = Promise.resolve(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    CachedCookies.set(underlyingCookies, promise);
 | 
						|
    Object.defineProperties(promise, {
 | 
						|
        [Symbol.iterator]: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies[Symbol.iterator] ? underlyingCookies[Symbol.iterator].bind(underlyingCookies) : // We should remove this and unify our cookies types. We could just let this continue to throw lazily
 | 
						|
            // but that's already a hard thing to debug so we may as well implement it consistently. The biggest problem with
 | 
						|
            // implementing this in this way is the underlying cookie type is a ResponseCookie and not a RequestCookie and so it
 | 
						|
            // has extra properties not available on RequestCookie instances.
 | 
						|
            polyfilledResponseCookiesIterator.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        size: {
 | 
						|
            get () {
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.size;
 | 
						|
            }
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        get: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies.get.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        getAll: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies.getAll.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        has: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies.has.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        set: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies.set.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        delete: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies.delete.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        clear: {
 | 
						|
            value: // @ts-expect-error clear is defined in RequestCookies implementation but not in the type
 | 
						|
            typeof underlyingCookies.clear === 'function' ? underlyingCookies.clear.bind(underlyingCookies) : // We should remove this and unify our cookies types. We could just let this continue to throw lazily
 | 
						|
            // but that's already a hard thing to debug so we may as well implement it consistently. The biggest problem with
 | 
						|
            // implementing this in this way is the underlying cookie type is a ResponseCookie and not a RequestCookie and so it
 | 
						|
            // has extra properties not available on RequestCookie instances.
 | 
						|
            polyfilledResponseCookiesClear.bind(underlyingCookies, promise)
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        toString: {
 | 
						|
            value: underlyingCookies.toString.bind(underlyingCookies)
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
    });
 | 
						|
    return promise;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function makeUntrackedExoticCookiesWithDevWarnings(underlyingCookies, route) {
 | 
						|
    const cachedCookies = CachedCookies.get(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    if (cachedCookies) {
 | 
						|
        return cachedCookies;
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    const promise = (0, _dynamicrenderingutils.makeDevtoolsIOAwarePromise)(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    CachedCookies.set(underlyingCookies, promise);
 | 
						|
    Object.defineProperties(promise, {
 | 
						|
        [Symbol.iterator]: {
 | 
						|
            value: function() {
 | 
						|
                const expression = '`...cookies()` or similar iteration';
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies[Symbol.iterator] ? underlyingCookies[Symbol.iterator].apply(underlyingCookies, arguments) : // We should remove this and unify our cookies types. We could just let this continue to throw lazily
 | 
						|
                // but that's already a hard thing to debug so we may as well implement it consistently. The biggest problem with
 | 
						|
                // implementing this in this way is the underlying cookie type is a ResponseCookie and not a RequestCookie and so it
 | 
						|
                // has extra properties not available on RequestCookie instances.
 | 
						|
                polyfilledResponseCookiesIterator.call(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        size: {
 | 
						|
            get () {
 | 
						|
                const expression = '`cookies().size`';
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.size;
 | 
						|
            }
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        get: {
 | 
						|
            value: function get() {
 | 
						|
                let expression;
 | 
						|
                if (arguments.length === 0) {
 | 
						|
                    expression = '`cookies().get()`';
 | 
						|
                } else {
 | 
						|
                    expression = `\`cookies().get(${describeNameArg(arguments[0])})\``;
 | 
						|
                }
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.get.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        getAll: {
 | 
						|
            value: function getAll() {
 | 
						|
                let expression;
 | 
						|
                if (arguments.length === 0) {
 | 
						|
                    expression = '`cookies().getAll()`';
 | 
						|
                } else {
 | 
						|
                    expression = `\`cookies().getAll(${describeNameArg(arguments[0])})\``;
 | 
						|
                }
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.getAll.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        has: {
 | 
						|
            value: function get() {
 | 
						|
                let expression;
 | 
						|
                if (arguments.length === 0) {
 | 
						|
                    expression = '`cookies().has()`';
 | 
						|
                } else {
 | 
						|
                    expression = `\`cookies().has(${describeNameArg(arguments[0])})\``;
 | 
						|
                }
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.has.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        set: {
 | 
						|
            value: function set() {
 | 
						|
                let expression;
 | 
						|
                if (arguments.length === 0) {
 | 
						|
                    expression = '`cookies().set()`';
 | 
						|
                } else {
 | 
						|
                    const arg = arguments[0];
 | 
						|
                    if (arg) {
 | 
						|
                        expression = `\`cookies().set(${describeNameArg(arg)}, ...)\``;
 | 
						|
                    } else {
 | 
						|
                        expression = '`cookies().set(...)`';
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
                }
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.set.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        delete: {
 | 
						|
            value: function() {
 | 
						|
                let expression;
 | 
						|
                if (arguments.length === 0) {
 | 
						|
                    expression = '`cookies().delete()`';
 | 
						|
                } else if (arguments.length === 1) {
 | 
						|
                    expression = `\`cookies().delete(${describeNameArg(arguments[0])})\``;
 | 
						|
                } else {
 | 
						|
                    expression = `\`cookies().delete(${describeNameArg(arguments[0])}, ...)\``;
 | 
						|
                }
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.delete.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        clear: {
 | 
						|
            value: function clear() {
 | 
						|
                const expression = '`cookies().clear()`';
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                // @ts-ignore clear is defined in RequestCookies implementation but not in the type
 | 
						|
                return typeof underlyingCookies.clear === 'function' ? underlyingCookies.clear.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments) : // We should remove this and unify our cookies types. We could just let this continue to throw lazily
 | 
						|
                // but that's already a hard thing to debug so we may as well implement it consistently. The biggest problem with
 | 
						|
                // implementing this in this way is the underlying cookie type is a ResponseCookie and not a RequestCookie and so it
 | 
						|
                // has extra properties not available on RequestCookie instances.
 | 
						|
                polyfilledResponseCookiesClear.call(underlyingCookies, promise);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        },
 | 
						|
        toString: {
 | 
						|
            value: function toString() {
 | 
						|
                const expression = '`cookies().toString()` or implicit casting';
 | 
						|
                syncIODev(route, expression);
 | 
						|
                return underlyingCookies.toString.apply(underlyingCookies, arguments);
 | 
						|
            },
 | 
						|
            writable: false
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
    });
 | 
						|
    return promise;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
// Similar to `makeUntrackedExoticCookiesWithDevWarnings`, but just logging the
 | 
						|
// sync access without actually defining the cookies properties on the promise.
 | 
						|
function makeUntrackedCookiesWithDevWarnings(underlyingCookies, route) {
 | 
						|
    const cachedCookies = CachedCookies.get(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    if (cachedCookies) {
 | 
						|
        return cachedCookies;
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    const promise = (0, _dynamicrenderingutils.makeDevtoolsIOAwarePromise)(underlyingCookies);
 | 
						|
    const proxiedPromise = new Proxy(promise, {
 | 
						|
        get (target, prop, receiver) {
 | 
						|
            switch(prop){
 | 
						|
                case Symbol.iterator:
 | 
						|
                    {
 | 
						|
                        warnForSyncAccess(route, '`...cookies()` or similar iteration');
 | 
						|
                        break;
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
                case 'size':
 | 
						|
                case 'get':
 | 
						|
                case 'getAll':
 | 
						|
                case 'has':
 | 
						|
                case 'set':
 | 
						|
                case 'delete':
 | 
						|
                case 'clear':
 | 
						|
                case 'toString':
 | 
						|
                    {
 | 
						|
                        warnForSyncAccess(route, `\`cookies().${prop}\``);
 | 
						|
                        break;
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
                default:
 | 
						|
                    {
 | 
						|
                    // We only warn for well-defined properties of the cookies object.
 | 
						|
                    }
 | 
						|
            }
 | 
						|
            return _reflect.ReflectAdapter.get(target, prop, receiver);
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
    });
 | 
						|
    CachedCookies.set(underlyingCookies, proxiedPromise);
 | 
						|
    return proxiedPromise;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function describeNameArg(arg) {
 | 
						|
    return typeof arg === 'object' && arg !== null && typeof arg.name === 'string' ? `'${arg.name}'` : typeof arg === 'string' ? `'${arg}'` : '...';
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function syncIODev(route, expression) {
 | 
						|
    const workUnitStore = _workunitasyncstorageexternal.workUnitAsyncStorage.getStore();
 | 
						|
    if (workUnitStore) {
 | 
						|
        switch(workUnitStore.type){
 | 
						|
            case 'request':
 | 
						|
                if (workUnitStore.prerenderPhase === true) {
 | 
						|
                    // When we're rendering dynamically in dev, we need to advance out of
 | 
						|
                    // the Prerender environment when we read Request data synchronously.
 | 
						|
                    (0, _dynamicrendering.trackSynchronousRequestDataAccessInDev)(workUnitStore);
 | 
						|
                }
 | 
						|
                break;
 | 
						|
            case 'prerender':
 | 
						|
            case 'prerender-client':
 | 
						|
            case 'prerender-runtime':
 | 
						|
            case 'prerender-ppr':
 | 
						|
            case 'prerender-legacy':
 | 
						|
            case 'cache':
 | 
						|
            case 'private-cache':
 | 
						|
            case 'unstable-cache':
 | 
						|
                break;
 | 
						|
            default:
 | 
						|
                workUnitStore;
 | 
						|
        }
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    // In all cases we warn normally
 | 
						|
    warnForSyncAccess(route, expression);
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
const warnForSyncAccess = (0, _creatededupedbycallsiteservererrorlogger.createDedupedByCallsiteServerErrorLoggerDev)(createCookiesAccessError);
 | 
						|
function createCookiesAccessError(route, expression) {
 | 
						|
    const prefix = route ? `Route "${route}" ` : 'This route ';
 | 
						|
    return Object.defineProperty(new Error(`${prefix}used ${expression}. ` + `\`cookies()\` should be awaited before using its value. ` + `Learn more: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/sync-dynamic-apis`), "__NEXT_ERROR_CODE", {
 | 
						|
        value: "E223",
 | 
						|
        enumerable: false,
 | 
						|
        configurable: true
 | 
						|
    });
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function polyfilledResponseCookiesIterator() {
 | 
						|
    return this.getAll().map((c)=>[
 | 
						|
            c.name,
 | 
						|
            c
 | 
						|
        ]).values();
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
function polyfilledResponseCookiesClear(returnable) {
 | 
						|
    for (const cookie of this.getAll()){
 | 
						|
        this.delete(cookie.name);
 | 
						|
    }
 | 
						|
    return returnable;
 | 
						|
}
 | 
						|
 | 
						|
//# sourceMappingURL=cookies.js.map
 |